Filtering of chimeric and discordant reads Figure S12. Overview of the STAR-Fusion pipeline Figure S11. Distribution of accuracy rankings with the paralog proxy allowance disabled Figure S10. Impact of ‘allow paralogs’ and ‘ignore uncertain’ fusions on accuracy rankings Figure S9. Correlation of fusion predictions among methods on the cancer cell line data sets Figure S8. Adjustments in counts of TP and FP after accepting likely paralogs as proxies for known fusion partners Figure S7. PPV at maximum F1 for each truth set Figure S6. Contrasting de novo transcript reconstructions according to TrinityFusion execution mode Figure S5. TPR and PPV at maximum F1 for fusion predictions based on simulated data sets Figure S4. minimum sum evidence fragments for the simulated 101 base length PE reads Figure S3. minimum sum evidence fragments for the simulated 50 base length PE reads Figure S2.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |